January 2026 was a month of contrast. We increased volume again, placing 98 bets across 15 leagues and 134 teams, and finished marginally positive at +$39.71. The headline, though, is the hit rate dropping to 36.7% after December’s 50.8%. With a bankroll-linked flat stake, that kind of swing is the familiar texture of variance: the edge can still be present, but outcomes cluster the other way for a while, especially as we widen league coverage and take on more different team profiles.
Performance concentrated in a couple of places. The clearest signal came from the 1 (home win) market, our best performing bet type at 51.2% (21/41), which suggests our biggest model-versus-market gaps may have been found in more straightforward win propositions rather than the tighter outcomes that helped us in December. By competition, the Championship stood out at 66.7% over 12 bets, a respectable return on a meaningful slice of the month’s activity, while the broader set of leagues collectively pulled the overall hit rate down.
The main lesson from January is that scale and selectivity are not the same thing. More bets gave us more information, but not necessarily cleaner results, and the drop in hit rate is a reminder to keep judging performance through pricing and process rather than short-term outcomes. Going forward, we should review where the additional leagues are diluting our edge, and whether our strongest tendencies are emerging in specific markets (notably 1) and competitions (notably the Championship), while staying disciplined about sample size before we treat any of it as structural.